- The Moat
- Posts
- ♖ Why 30-60-90 day plans don't work. Try this instead.
♖ Why 30-60-90 day plans don't work. Try this instead.
The Moat | Issue 026

Hi Moaters,
A few weeks ago, I got a text from a dear friend who's a Partner at a major law firm:

I didn’t respond right away. Not because I didn’t want to help, but because, honestly, I’ve always had a weird relationship with 30/60/90 plans.
I’ve never enjoyed them. They feel overly structured, weirdly arbitrary, and deeply performative.
We do them because we’re supposed to. But almost every great team I’ve seen, especially in B2B, succeeds despite these plans, not because of them.
So I sat with her question, for weeks.
And what emerged is something I’ve been thinking deeply about as we scale at Pricing I/O.
This issue is my honest response, a first-principles reframe on what onboarding is actually for.

The Problem: We Mistake Time for Transformation
Every onboarding playbook starts with the same question: What should someone accomplish in their first 30, 60, and 90 days?
But that’s the wrong question in my opinion.
Time doesn’t guarantee progress. People don’t transform just because the calendar flips.
What we should be asking is: What determines whether someone succeeds or fails in a role long-term?
But none of these outcomes are caused by checklists.
They’re caused by psychological and cultural transitions that drive performance, the shift from outsider to insider, follower to leader, observer to owner.
And weak onboarding doesn’t just hurt morale, it’s measurable. It shows up as slower cycle times, poor decision quality, and dependency loops that sap throughput.
In short, bad onboarding is a productivity tax.

30/60/90 Doesn’t Drive Performance
Most onboarding fails quietly. Not because people aren’t smart or capable, but because they never make the internal shifts that actually matter.
They stay in limbo, always asking permission, afraid to speak up, still saying "you guys" instead of "we," and unsure how decisions are made.
The traditional model assumes time equals progress, one plan works for all roles, and tasks are more important than transitions.
But great onboarding isn’t about how quickly someone learns the tools, it’s about how quickly they take ownership, make confident decisions, and connect their work to outcomes.
When those transitions stall, performance stalls. People operate in the company but not for it.
Did someone forward this email to you? Click here to subscribe so you don't miss out on future issues.

The Solution: The Ownership Arc
What if onboarding isn’t time-based at all?
What if every successful hire, regardless of function or seniority, simply goes through four universal transitions that correlate directly to business impact?

1. Stranger → Accepted
They go from outsider the organization is evaluating to member the organization wants to succeed.
Why it matters: Retention risk drops dramatically once people feel socially accepted. Until they do, they’ll hesitate to take initiative or challenge ideas. Belonging unlocks discretionary effort.
Signals: They stop apologizing for questions. They use “we,” not “you.” They proactively collaborate.
Actions for leaders:
Assign a buddy before Day 1, increases early connection and clarity (LinkedIn research shows 97% higher early productivity when buddies meet 8+ times in first 90 days).
Manager 1:1 on Day 1: “Here’s why I hired you,” builds trust and purpose immediately.
Pre-boarding communication (welcome note and expectations).
Celebrate the first contribution publicly, social reinforcement builds belonging.
Personal introductions to cross-functional peers, expands early network and confidence.
2. Confused → Oriented
They build a mental model of how things operate and how decisions get made.
Why it matters: Clarity creates speed. Teams that understand decision flows and context make better calls, faster.
Signals: They know who decides what. They stop escalating every decision. They anticipate blockers.
Actions for leaders:
Walk them through one real company decision: who decided, how, and why, context beats slides.
Shadow two cross-functional meetings, learn power dynamics firsthand.
Provide a “who-to-go-to” map, clarifies influence and decision paths.
Share a one-page “Why We Exist” strategy doc, anchors decisions in company purpose.
Encourage questions that start with “Why do we...”, signals psychological safety and learning.
3. Dependent → Autonomous
They move from needs guidance to executes independently.
Why it matters: Autonomy is where ROI shows up. When people can make decisions confidently and consistently, throughput increases, and managerial drag decreases. Structured autonomy can increase productivity by up to 25% and reduce time-to-proficiency by 34% (HBR).
Signals: They take initiative. They deliver projects without review. They know when to seek input vs. decide alone.
Actions for leaders:
Clarify decision rights early: what’s yours, what’s mine, prevents bottlenecks.
Define one company metric and one team metric to influence, provides alignment and ownership.
Run short feedback loops weekly, course-correct faster.
Introduce “graduated ownership” projects, builds confidence through early wins.
Create safe-to-fail opportunities, normalizes iteration and risk-taking.
4. Foreigner → Native
They internalize the culture and start transmitting it.
Why it matters: Cultural fluency enables consistent judgment. It’s the difference between good output and aligned output.
Signals: They make decisions you would’ve made. They teach newcomers. They challenge misaligned behavior.
Actions for leaders:
Share stories, not slogans, storytelling increases cultural recall by 20x compared to text-based training (Stanford research).
Include them in key rituals (offsites, all-hands), reinforces belonging and visibility.
Ask them to explain the culture back to you, reveals what’s actually internalized.
Recognize when they demonstrate values in action, reinforces norms through positive modeling.
Invite them to onboard others, teaching cements mastery and alignment.
These transitions happen at different speeds for different roles. Entry-level hires might do all four in 30 days. A senior executive might take a year.
The point: the transitions are universal, the timeline is not.

The Power of the Reframe
The Ownership Arc isn’t a soft culture model. It’s a performance system.
Each stage removes a specific form of friction that drains productivity:
Acceptance unlocks confidence; faster contribution. Orientation unlocks clarity; better decisions. Autonomy unlocks throughput; higher leverage. Cultural fluency unlocks consistency; scalable execution.
That’s the performance equation. When people move through the Ownership Arc faster, the company compounds value faster.
So instead of tracking onboarding by dates, track it by capability acceleration. Ask: Has this person made the next stage yet? If not, what’s blocking it?
That question alone shifts onboarding from a checklist to a performance system.

The Actions for B2B Leaders
Here are universal moves every leader can make starting next week:
Run an Ownership Audit. Pick one new hire. Identify which stage of the arc they’ve reached and where they’re stuck.
Reframe onboarding reviews. Replace “What did you complete?” with “Where are you on the Ownership Arc?”
Connect onboarding to metrics. During onboarding, explicitly name one company metric and one team metric you want each hire to influence and explain why. This single act ties clarity to performance.
Equip managers. Train them to identify stage signals and intervene early.
Design for clarity. Make decision rights and success metrics explicit. Remove ambiguity fast.
Embed storytelling. Replace culture decks with lived examples, decisions that show what you value.
These small shifts compound into a system that builds confidence, clarity, and speed, the real ROI of onboarding.

Takeaway
Success in a new role isn’t measured by time, it’s measured by transformation.
The faster people move through the Ownership Arc, the faster they create impact that lasts.
So instead of asking “Where are they in their onboarding?”, ask: Which transition are they in, and how can we help them cross it?
That’s where retention, confidence, and performance actually begin.
Til next time,
—Ali
P.S. I’m always collecting ideas for future issues, what’s something you’ve been thinking about lately that deserves a deeper dive?


About Me: I'm Ali, Head of Growth at Pricing I/O. I write about building winning strategies without losing your soul. I write The Moat to help B2B leaders scale strategy, teams, and execution.

Mind rating today's email? |
Reply